Saturday, 16 August 2008

Georgia Quits CIS

Georgia Quits CIS

Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 12 Aug.'08

President Saakashvili said Georgia would quit the Commonwealth ofIndependent States (CIS) and officially denounce Russian troops inAbkhazia and South Ossetia as “occupational forces.”
“We have decided to quit the CIS and to say farewell to the SovietUnion,” Saakashvili told a crowd of tens of thousands of people gatheredoutside Parliament. “We call on Ukraine and other members to also quitthe Russian-ruled CIS .”
“We have also decided to rescind the Russian peacekeepers’ mandate andto declare Abkhazia and South Ossetia occupied territories of Georgia,”he added.

Friday, 15 August 2008

Saakashvili Says Russia Hit Pipeline; BP Unaware

Saakashvili Says Russia Hit Pipeline; BP Unaware
Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 12 Aug.'08
Speaking at a news conference for foreign journalists in Tbilisi onAugust 12, President Saakashvili said that the Russian air strikes hitthe BP-operated oil pipeline in Georgia.Earlier this morning the Georgian officials have claimed the Russianwarplanes dropped three bombs in the area through which the Baku-Supsapipeline runs. It was also reported that one bomb hit the pipelinewithout exploding.BP-Azerbaijan, however, said it was unaware of the attack.“All our facilities are intact and we have no such information," Reutersquoted a BP official as saying.---------------------------------------------------------------BP shuts two energy pipelines in Georgia12.08.2008LONDON (AFP) — British energy giant BP said Tuesday that it has closedtwo more oil and gas pipelines in Georgia because of the ongoingconflict with Russia."We have closed two other pipelines in Georgia -- Baku-Supsa and theSouth Caucasus pipeline, which is a gas pipeline," a BP spokesman told AFP.The key Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, which BP also operates, wasshut last week after a blast occurred in a pump at a section in easternTurkey.Russia's armed forces on Tuesday denied deliberately targeting thestrategic BTC conduit running through Georgia after Tbilisi claimed ithad been attacked by the Russian air force."The oil pipeline was never a target that needed to be bombed," deputychief of general staff Anatoly Nogovitsyn said in a televised pressconference.He did not explicitly rule out the possibility that the pipeline mighthave been hit accidentally.BP was also looking into the claim. "We're not aware of any attack atall. We have no report at all of an attack," a spokeswoman told AFPearlier on Tuesday.Georgia's security council chairman said that Russian warplanes hadtargeted the BTC pipeline, which is used to transport oil from theCaspian Sea to Turkey's Mediterranean coast, but could not confirm anydamage."Russians bombed the BTC pipeline south of the city of Rustavi," saidAlexander Lomaia. "We don't know yet whether it was damaged. It's thesecond attempt to bomb this pipeline since August 10."BP operates the 1,774-kilometre (1,109-mile) BTC pipeline -- the world'ssecond largest -- that carries oil from Azerbaijan to Western marketsvia the Turkish Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. It is capable oftransporting 1.2 million barrels of crude per day.

Gazeta Wyborcza Georgia: the Russians Behaving Like in Chechnya

Gazeta Wyborcza Georgia: the Russians Behaving Like in Chechnya
Wojciech Jagielski, Gori2008-08-12, ostatnia aktualizacja 2008-08-12 08:18
When French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner arrived at the hospital inGori on Monday afternoon to visit the war victims, he was passed in thedoorway by orderlies carrying a stretcher with yet another corpse.They took it to the hospital's morgue, where there put it besides adozen others, those who had died on Sunday.'On Friday and Saturday they kept bringing the dead and wounded. Twohundred every day. The sound of sirens was deafening', says MerabMakharadze, a surgeon from Tbilisi, who, when the war with Russia inSouth Ossetia broke out, came to Gori as a volunteer. 'On Sunday, thingscalmed down, we took in some 50-60 people. But today, even though it'sonly noon, they've already brought almost a hundred'.On the first day of the war, virtually all patients brought to thehospital were soldiers. The lightly wounded, covered in bandages, inold, often blood-stained uniforms, stroll among the trees in thehospital's orchard.They don't want to talk about the night battles in the South Ossetiancapital of Tskhinvali, where they were beaten first by Russian tanks andaircraft, and then by paratroopers brought from Pskov. Before burstinginto tears, Private Dawid Guguladze managed to say only that he hadnever imagined it would be such a nightmare.Since Saturday, when the fighting in the streets subsided, most of thepatients have been civilians, victims of Russian air raids, but also ofthe first pacification operations carried out by the Russians inGeorgian-dominated villages in South Ossetia. The nine villages, orrather settlements, were inhabited by several thousand people.They didn't leave in the 1990s, when South Ossetia announced a secessionand, supported by Russia, won a war against Georgia. They didn't leavenow, when Georgian troops entered Tskhinvali last Friday to quash theinsubordinate republic's rebellion. The Georgians' initial advances musthave assured them they were safe. When Russia sent troops to SouthOssetia, and combat aircraft before that, it was already too late toflee. The villages are surrounded by Ossetian settlements from thenorth, and when Tskhinvali to the south was taken by the Russians, allevacuation routes to Georgia were cut off.'Some manage to get through, even though, by setting off on the journey,they risk their lives', says doctor Makharadze. 'But not evacuating thewounded from the villages they'd be leaving them to death'.Those who are desperate enough and have enough fuel, set off as soon asthe Russian warplanes leave and the sound of the bombs dropped by themdies away. They expose themselves to the shelling by Russian andOssetian outposts, to aircraft pursuits. 'I'm not sure whether I moresympathise with their plight or admire their courage', says doctorMakharadze.His patients tell him about life in the besieged, shelled and air-raidedvillages. The dwellers hide in the basements, leaving their sheltersonly to bring some food and water and hide before the guns start theircannonade again. It is the rumble of their fire that can be heard duringthe day from the hills around Tskhinvali.Doctor Daridzhan Kakhidze, a friend of Mr Makharadze's, who has alsocome to Gori as a volunteer from the Tbilisi ambulance service, addsthat the most recent wave of patients are victims of Russianpacification operations in the Georgian villages. In South Ossetia, butalso in Gori county, on the Georgian side of the border.'Russian soldiers enter the villages as soon as the warplanes bombingthem have left. They search the houses, check documents, saying they'relooking for guerrillas and spies', Ms Kakhidze says. 'People say theyact exceptionally brutal, like they recently did in Chechnya'.First nearly 40,000 Ossetians fled the province, which has a totalpopulation of 60-70,000, from the advancing Georgians. Now it's theGeorgians, who were few there anyway, who are fleeing from the Russians.translated by Marcin WawrzyńczakŹródło: Gazeta Wyborczahttp://tinyurl.com/5qhdzn

Dutch journalist killed in Russian bombing of Gori

Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008
Dutch journalist killed in Russian bombing of Gori
The Associated PressTBILISI, Georgia A Dutch television journalist was killed overnight whenRussian warplanes bombed the central Georgian city of Gori.The television news station RTL reported on its Web site that itscameraman Stan Storimans, 39, was killed and correspondent JeroenAkkermans was wounded in the leg in the attack. RTL said at least fivepeople died in the Gori bombing.At least two other journalists have been reported killed previously inthe fighting between Georgian and Russian troops, now in its fifth day.Gori was bombed overnight by Russian forces who have occupied the nearbyGeorgian separatist region of South Ossetia and on Monday advanced intoGeorgia proper. Gori was all but deserted late Monday after mostremaining residents and Georgian soldiers fled.Dutch Ambassador Onno Van Elderenbosch said Storimans was working in amedia center that had been set up on the top floor of Gori's three-storytelevision and radio center. It was not clear whether the buildingitself had been hit.However, Georgian officials say Russian forces have been targetingadministrative buildings. The television center is located 200 meters(yards) from Gori's central administrative building.Gori's university and its post office were on fire Tuesday after thebombings, Georgian officials said.Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen, who knew Storimans, summoned theRussian ambassador to his office in The Hague on Tuesday for anexplanation of what happened."My thoughts go out to Mr. Storimans' family, especially his wife andtwo children," Verhagen said in a statement, calling him a "hardworkingprofessional and an exceptionally sympathetic man."Storimans had planned to publish a book this year describing his 20years of reporting from hotspots like Sri Lanka, Congo, Indonesia,Afghanistan, Iraq and the former Yugoslavia, among others.RTL Nieuws, based in Hilversum, Netherlands, is controlled byLuxembourg-based RTL Group SA, Europe's largest private broadcastingcompany, which in turn is owned by German media conglomerate Bertelsmann AG.

Did Russian cyber attacks precede military action?

Did Russian cyber attacks precede military action?
Submitted by stiennon on Tue, 08/12/2008 - 8:46am.
The RBNexploit blog states that the website president.gov.ge was underDDoS attack since Thursday. That site is now hosted out of Atlanta,Georgia (don't you love coincidence?) by Tulip Systems who isprominently displaying an AP story whcih says in part:"The original servers located in the country of Georgia were "floodedand blocked by Russians" over the weekend, Nino Doijashvili, chiefexecutive of Atlanta-based hosting company Tulip Systems Inc., said Monday.The Georgian-born Doijashvili happened to be on vacation in Georgiawhen fighting broke out on Friday. She cold-called the government tooffer her help and transferred president.gov.ge and rustavi2.com, theWeb site of a prominent Georgian TV station, to her company's serversSaturday.Speaking via cell phone from Georgia, Doijashvili said the attacks,traced to Moscow and St. Petersburg, are continuing on the U.S. servers.The president's site was intermittently available midday Monday.Route-tracing performed by the AP confirmed that the sites were hostedat Tulip."See that part about the attacks continuing after the web server wasmoved to Atlanta? Remember my warnings when this broke out? If youhappen to host your web applications on Tulip Systems' servers you maybe suffering from slow response times or even outages. Collateral damagefrom cyber war.Rusisan military surrogates in the form of the criminal Russian BusinessNetwork are engaged in attacks against servers on US soil. This pointshould be brought up as the Group of 8-1 discusses appropriate responsesto Russia's attack on Georgia.Ok, one more point. Thursday? The attacks on the President's web serverstarted *before* the action started in South Ossitia? Was this whole warpre-meditated on the part of Russia? Did they incite Georgia to takeaction against the separatists at a time that was oh so convenientlycoincident with the start of the Olympics in Beijing? I may be sufferingfrom time-zone confusion but when the dust settles Russia is going tohave some explaining to do.1. Was the war with Georgia orchestrated? (I know this is obvious, butdiplomacy seems so far removed from reality I think the point should bestressed.)2. How did the criminals at RBN know to launch attacks when they did?(In other words what is the real connection between RBN and Putin'smachine?)3. Russia has now launched cyber attacks against a web site physicallyhosted in the US. Is that an act of cyber war?While the press focuses on Medvedev's call for a "halt" to the war(which is oddly enough still continuing according to Georgia) attentionshould also be paid to the ongoing cyber war.

IHT: Russia blames the victim

International Herald TribuneWAR WITH GEORGIARussia blames the victimBy Svante E. CornellAugust 12, 2008WASHINGTON:Russia is portraying its war in Georgia as a legitimate response toGeorgia's incursion last week into its breakaway region of SouthOssetia. Many in the West, while condemning the disproportionate natureof Russia's response, are also critical of Georgian President MikheilSaakashvili for his attempts to bring South Ossetia back under Georgianrule, and of the United States for supposedly encouraging Saakashvili'srisk-taking by pushing NATO membership for Georgia.But the truth is that for the past several months, Russia, not Georgia,has been stoking tensions in South Ossetia and another of Georgia'sbreakaway areas, Abkhazia. After NATO held a summit meeting in Bucharestin April - at which Georgia and Ukraine received positive signs ofpotential membership - President Vladimir Putin of Russia signed adecree effectively treating Abkhazia and South Ossetia as parts of theRussian Federation. This was a direct violation of Georgia's territorialintegrity.It came after years of growing Russian efforts to assert control overthese regions, for example by distributing Russian passports to citizensand arranging the appointment of Russians to the territories'governments. Putin, who is now Russia's prime minister, oversaw abuild-up of Russian "peacekeeping" forces in Abkhazia, which was clearlyintended to provoke Georgia into a military response.Yet Georgia showed restraint - in large part because Saakashviliunderstood that military adventurism would harm his NATO prospects.Moscow, in turn, transferred its efforts to South Ossetia, wherepro-Russian rebels carried out attacks on Georgian forces and villages,finally provoking the response that Moscow had sought as a pretext tointervene.Now Moscow has sent out the Black Sea fleet to Georgia's coast andbroadened the war into Abkhazia and Georgia proper, showing thatMoscow's war is not just about South Ossetia. In any case, Moscow's owntreatment of separatism - killing tens of thousands of Chechens over thepast decade - says volumes about its claims that it is just trying toprotect a minority population.This war is about making an example in Georgia, about the consequencespost-Soviet countries will suffer for standing up to Moscow, conductingdemocratic reforms and seeking military and economic ties with the West.No Eurasian country has come so far as Georgia in recent years in termsof democratization and reform.Georgia has the third-largest contingent of forces in Iraq, and beforethis crisis it had pledged to send forces to Afghanistan.If Georgia is allowed to fall, governments across Eurasia will certainlytake note, especially those - such as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Ukraine- that have built ties with the West and sought closer integration inEuropean institutions, drawing Moscow's ire.Should the United States allow Russia to occupy Georgia or even justdepose the Saakashvili government, the implications for America'sstanding in Eurasia would be dire. Washington would risk losing thesupport of the post-Soviet states of Central Asia that are cooperatingwith the American mission in Afghanistan, along with hopes of westwardexports of more Central Asian energy.Many who might agree with this analysis nonetheless shrug theirshoulders over solutions. Indeed, we have no real military optionsagainst Russia. But we can put together a meaningful comprehensivereaction, attaching real costs to Russia for its policies.America must hit where it hurts: Russia's international prestige, anobsession of Putin's. To begin with, we must do everything possible tosee Russia's membership in the Group of 8 be suspended (something theRepublican presidential hopeful John McCain called for even before thiscrisis).Once the fighting is over, America must step up its campaign for NATOmembership for Georgia and Ukraine. Should European countries reject theidea, America could designate them "major non-NATO allies," along thelines of Israel and Pakistan. This would involve more American militarytrainers in Georgia, intelligence sharing, joint exercises and othersteps, if not a full pledge by Washington to defend the country in caseof attack.Finally, in a measure of fitting symbolism, America must note thatRussia started this war on the opening day of the Olympics, while itplans to hold its own Winter Olympics only a dozen miles from the victimof its aggression. America should seriously consider announcing aboycott of the 2014 Sochi Olympics. We owe our Georgian allies nothing less.Svante E. Cornell is the research director of the Central Asia-CaucasusInstitute at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced InternationalStudies.http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/12/opinion/edcornell.php

IHT: Russia blames the victim

International Herald TribuneWAR WITH GEORGIARussia blames the victimBy Svante E. CornellAugust 12, 2008WASHINGTON:Russia is portraying its war in Georgia as a legitimate response toGeorgia's incursion last week into its breakaway region of SouthOssetia. Many in the West, while condemning the disproportionate natureof Russia's response, are also critical of Georgian President MikheilSaakashvili for his attempts to bring South Ossetia back under Georgianrule, and of the United States for supposedly encouraging Saakashvili'srisk-taking by pushing NATO membership for Georgia.But the truth is that for the past several months, Russia, not Georgia,has been stoking tensions in South Ossetia and another of Georgia'sbreakaway areas, Abkhazia. After NATO held a summit meeting in Bucharestin April - at which Georgia and Ukraine received positive signs ofpotential membership - President Vladimir Putin of Russia signed adecree effectively treating Abkhazia and South Ossetia as parts of theRussian Federation. This was a direct violation of Georgia's territorialintegrity.It came after years of growing Russian efforts to assert control overthese regions, for example by distributing Russian passports to citizensand arranging the appointment of Russians to the territories'governments. Putin, who is now Russia's prime minister, oversaw abuild-up of Russian "peacekeeping" forces in Abkhazia, which was clearlyintended to provoke Georgia into a military response.Yet Georgia showed restraint - in large part because Saakashviliunderstood that military adventurism would harm his NATO prospects.Moscow, in turn, transferred its efforts to South Ossetia, wherepro-Russian rebels carried out attacks on Georgian forces and villages,finally provoking the response that Moscow had sought as a pretext tointervene.Now Moscow has sent out the Black Sea fleet to Georgia's coast andbroadened the war into Abkhazia and Georgia proper, showing thatMoscow's war is not just about South Ossetia. In any case, Moscow's owntreatment of separatism - killing tens of thousands of Chechens over thepast decade - says volumes about its claims that it is just trying toprotect a minority population.This war is about making an example in Georgia, about the consequencespost-Soviet countries will suffer for standing up to Moscow, conductingdemocratic reforms and seeking military and economic ties with the West.No Eurasian country has come so far as Georgia in recent years in termsof democratization and reform.Georgia has the third-largest contingent of forces in Iraq, and beforethis crisis it had pledged to send forces to Afghanistan.If Georgia is allowed to fall, governments across Eurasia will certainlytake note, especially those - such as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Ukraine- that have built ties with the West and sought closer integration inEuropean institutions, drawing Moscow's ire.Should the United States allow Russia to occupy Georgia or even justdepose the Saakashvili government, the implications for America'sstanding in Eurasia would be dire. Washington would risk losing thesupport of the post-Soviet states of Central Asia that are cooperatingwith the American mission in Afghanistan, along with hopes of westwardexports of more Central Asian energy.Many who might agree with this analysis nonetheless shrug theirshoulders over solutions. Indeed, we have no real military optionsagainst Russia. But we can put together a meaningful comprehensivereaction, attaching real costs to Russia for its policies.America must hit where it hurts: Russia's international prestige, anobsession of Putin's. To begin with, we must do everything possible tosee Russia's membership in the Group of 8 be suspended (something theRepublican presidential hopeful John McCain called for even before thiscrisis).Once the fighting is over, America must step up its campaign for NATOmembership for Georgia and Ukraine. Should European countries reject theidea, America could designate them "major non-NATO allies," along thelines of Israel and Pakistan. This would involve more American militarytrainers in Georgia, intelligence sharing, joint exercises and othersteps, if not a full pledge by Washington to defend the country in caseof attack.Finally, in a measure of fitting symbolism, America must note thatRussia started this war on the opening day of the Olympics, while itplans to hold its own Winter Olympics only a dozen miles from the victimof its aggression. America should seriously consider announcing aboycott of the 2014 Sochi Olympics. We owe our Georgian allies nothing less.Svante E. Cornell is the research director of the Central Asia-CaucasusInstitute at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced InternationalStudies.http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/12/opinion/edcornell.php